From the Telegraph, via Mark Reckons:

Footage captured on a police dashboard camera shows one officer striking the driver’s seat window with a baton up to 15 times and another officer jumping on the bonnet of the car and kicking the windscreen in an apparent attempt to crack it.

Police pulled over Robert Whatley, 70, for not wearing a seat belt as he drove through country lanes in South Wales. The 8-mile chase started after officers tried to give Mr Whatley a fixed penalty notice but he drove off.

The video is embedded below:

What I find intriguing is Mark’s take on the subject:

The Police officers involved have been suspended pending an investigation but frankly I am not sure what needs investigating. They terrified a confused pensioner with as far as I can tell no justification, acting like utter thugs. The man has a heart condition. We could easily have been looking at something much more serious here. Next time maybe we will. That’s why we need to try and make sure there is not a next time.

I’m not saying for a moment that police brutality is in any way acceptable, but it seems quite obvious, to me, that there definitely was a cause for chasing this gentleman and arresting him.

Not only was he not wearing a seatbelt, he also drove off when the police tried to give him a fixed penalty notice. If this is down to him being “confused”, then to be honest, I doubt he should be on the road at all: if he’d been thinking straight, surely he’d have understood that trying to give the police the slip was a bad idea.

Whilst there’s no doubt that the police were heavy-handed, and the two officers involved have, quite rightly, been suspended for smashing the car’s window and dragging the accused out, I find it very hard to feel any sympathy for Mr. Whatley.

The fact he was a “terrified pensioner” had nothing to do with it. The bottom line is that he has been charged with several driving offences and drove off from the police. The law applies to everyone, terrified pensioner or not: it is plainly obvious (to me at least) that this is hardly likely to be as black and white as either the Telegraph or Mark make it out to be.

Tags: , ,



The revolting new retirement homes on London Road

Originally uploaded by Jonathan Rothwell


This picture has a bit of a story behind it.

Many moons ago, I was a member of an archaeology club in Bagshot, Surrey. It was held in the Surrey Archaeology Centre on the A30, a disused police station next door to a bar, diner and nightclub-thingy, called The Barn at Pantiles if I remember correctly.

Last time I went to the archaeology club was some time in 2006ish, and at that time the Pantiles was closing up shop. Four years later, I was in Bagshot for a jog, and came across this monstrosity occupying the former car park of the Pantiles.

Retirement homes are never a model of architectural brilliance (there’s one in Camberley that looks a bit like a weird cross between a Spanish villa and an Edwardian cottage) but this one just takes the biscuit.

The surroundings are comparatively mundane, and the landscaping is tasteful enough. It’s on the side of the A30, and a short walk from the railway station and many shops, so I doubt it’s particularly bad for the residents. However, must it be so architecturally hideous?

It looks like this all the way round, with the urbane mock-Victorian and Edwardian walls often giving way to completely mismatched faux Tudor facades jutting out at irregular intervals.

Overall, I think it looks more like a low-rate Premier Inn than a home for the senior.

Tags: , ,

I’ve written an article over at t’other place about common misconceptions about Windows (e.g. XP is better than Vista, disabling UAC is OK.)

August 4, 2010 | No comments

« Older entries § Newer entries »