Being someone who believes in ‘alternative’ health models can’t be easy: you have the whole of science ridiculing you, the whole of the real hippy movement disowning you, and now, the evil council switches on the Antichrist, otherwise known as free wi-fi.
Quite amusingly, the trial run of the wi-fi has been running for seven months, and it’s only now that the posse have started complaining about ‘negative energy’ and ‘ley lines’ being distrupted.
People have even started selling so-called ‘orgone’ generators to ‘recycle’ the negative energy. (Interestingly, PZ ‘it’s a frackin’ cracker’ Myers has noted that these ‘orgone’ generators are supposed to pump out magical sexual energies. No pun intended.)
The Telegraph article states that:
At a public meeting to discuss alleged health problems in the Somerset town, residents complained of numerous symptoms including headaches, dizziness, rashes and even pneumonia.
I’m intrigued. Millions of people live within range of a wi-fi network 24/7 (myself included) and the number of those reporting negative effects is positively miniscule. Assuming the negative effects are caused by wi-fi networks in a select few people, how come so many of these people are congregated around Glastonbury? Why does the population of the town, which was approximately 9,000 at the time of the last census, have such a high proportion of people who claim to be affected?
Then we come to the scientific aspect. The amount of EM radiation emitted by a wi-fi base station is tiny. It’s in the 2.4~5gHz band, which is the same as mobile phone masts–and domestic microwave ovens.
Wireless base stations emit a nominal power output of 20dBm. A domestic microwave, which has a power rating, say, of 800W, emits 59dBm, far more than a wi-fi base station. Even assuming that 99.9% of the energy is caught by the Faraday cage that microwaves employ to keep the operator safe, the total output would only be 29dBm. That’s still more than a wi-fi station would ever put out.


