mac os x

You are currently browsing articles tagged mac os x.

Sadly, it's just a mockup, but it's gorgeous anyway

Sadly, it's just a mockup, but it's gorgeous anyway

Well, not long to go now until WWDC 2009. The rumour mills are once again chugging away, and the general gist of them is as such:

  • Apple will almost certainly announce a new iPhone, probably with video conferencing. iPhone OS X 3.0 will certainly be putting in an appearance.
  • Snow Leopard’s final preview build will be released (we know this) and we can expect speed improvements, improved memory management and 64-bit optimisation, a brand new Finder written in Cocoa (really? it took nine and a half damn years?) and possibly a new UI, codenamed Marble. It’s known that QuickTime is getting a major upgrade, and is also getting a revised silver icon.
  • This isn’t really a rumour, but it’ll be interesting to see, in the coming months, how Apple reacts to Palm’s move to make the Pre fake an iPod (and therefore sync with iTunes). They could do one of three things: they could update iTunes to remove the sync functionality with the Pre, they could leave it as it is, or they could offer an olive branch to third-party hardware developers and start offering an iTunes API. I think the third would be the wisest, but the second is the most likely.
  • And finally… the Dear Leader. He took leave from Apple until sometime in June, and we know that his minions, Phil Schiller and Tim Cook will be doing the WWDC keynote. Although Schiller ain’t bad, he’s not as confident and doesn’t have as much charisma as Jobs. Tim Cook is like watching Dick van Dyke trying to read the news—it’s painful. However, if video conferencing on the iPhone is one of the features that will be announced… well, I wouldn’t be in any way surprised if he made a surprise appearance, say, calling from a fresh iPhone in the audience.
  • Someone, somewhere in the WWDC audience will need fresh underpants at some point during the keynote, because the previous set will have melted.

Tags: , ,

I’m in Safari 4

I’m typing from Safari 4. And, I have to say, it looks eerily familiar. Recognise anything?

<span style=

Yes, that really is Safari. And it looks suspiciously like Apple’s UI designers have been *cough* taking some cues from Google Chrome’s UI design.

Apart from the new interface, there’s little else to report: the march of Cover Flow through Apple’s product line continues, there’s a new (suspiciously Chrome-like) speed dial, à la Opera, and things are generally faster all around using a new JavaScript engine and an updated WebKit renderer.

In an interesting move, Safari on Windows now uses the native widget toolkit–Apple’s reliance on its own Aero toolkit has added bloat for far too long, and although the Aqua look is pretty, it looks cheap and nasty when merged with Aero.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

texteditBy default, the text editor on Mac OS X is TextEdit, a superficially rather simple RTF and plaintext editor not dissimilar to WordPad on Windows. It replaced SimpleText from MacOS 7–9, and was more advanced: it supported more file formats, was written in Cocoa, and (due to OS X’s superior typographical functions through AAT) could have typographic functions not offered even by most commercial word processors. It’s also very lightweight: the application only weighs in at approximately one megabyte.

And, perhaps as the cherry on the top of this tiny, perfectly formed cake… it’s open source.

Yes, really. Apple distributes the source code on its Developer Connection website, and in the Examples section of the Xcode Developer Tools DVD. It’s also under quite a permissive license, requiring (IIRC) only that if it’s redistributed with modifications, you’re not allowed to use Apple’s branding to endorse it, and, of course, credits must remain intact. (Alternatively, it could be APSL licensed, but the source files I’ve examined don’t mention it.)

It’s been ported to Linux under GNUStep (TextEdit.app is available with most GNUStep-based desktop environments)–nevertheless, I’m surprised that it hasn’t received more recognition. It’s a decent plaintext editor and is also more lightweight than AbiWord. I’d rather use it than gedit and Abiword on a Linux system. Is a GTK+ port too much to ask for…?

Tags: , , , ,

« Older entries