the world

You are currently browsing articles tagged the world.

It seems Pat “Dunderhead” Robertson has finally lost his mind completely.

Seemingly discontent with claiming Doomsday in would happen at the end of 1982 (which it didn’t), that Scotland is a “dark land overrun by homosexuals” (which it isn’t), that Hinduism is “demonic” (which it isn’t), that there would be a tsunami in the Pacific Northwest in 2006 (which there wasn’t) and that there would be mass killings, probably nuclear, in the USA 2007 (which there weren’t), Robertson has now made this address on his television programme, in which he announces the cause of the recent earthquake in Haiti:

You know, Christy, something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French. Ahhh…you know, Napoleon the Third and whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the Devil. They said we will serve you if you get us free from the French. True Story. And so the Devil said “Okay, it’s a deal.” and…uh…they kicked the French out. You know, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since they have been cursed by one thing after the other. Desperately poor. That island of Hispaniola is one island. It’s cut down the middle, on one side is Haiti, on the other side is the Dominican Republic. Dominican Republic is prosperous, healthy, full of resorts, etc. Haiti is in desperate poverty. Same island. Um, they need to have, and we need to pray for them, a great turning to God. And out of this tragedy, I’m optimistic, something good may come.

Watch it here if you like (nofollow has been vigorously applied)—it’s about the six-minute mark, and every bit as putrid as it sounds.

I strongly suggest donating to the British Red Cross’s emergency appeal: every penny counts, and Haiti needs our help and attention right now more than this nincompoop deserves in a lifetime.

Tags: , , , , ,

I haven’t been blogging much, lately. Silly me.

This is mainly because I (a) haven’t got enough time, and (b) sometimes can’t think of much to write about. Annoyingly, these two criteria are never both fulfilled at the same time.

However, I shall try and combat both of these problems with a new weekly news round-up, issued on the Friday of every week (well, every week I can be bothered.)

A small note – this is not likely to resemble the ‘real’ news. It represents news that I find interesting and relevant, from around the Internet, and from around the world of these carbon-based bipeds (and, if relevant, quadrupeds, or cephalopods if PZ Myers has upset a lot of people that week.)

And, somewhat fittingly, we begin this week with exactly that: PZ Myers has angered several Catholic lobbyist groups by making a joke about a communion wafer. Prof. Myers was writing about a rather ludicrous situation where some idiot removed a communion wafer from a Catholic church – presumably just to irritate the congregation. Little did this (admittedly idiotic) person realise that he would receive death threats over the matter. He wrote that the wafer was a ‘goddamned cracker’ and suggested that later he would find a cracker and desecrate it, just to annoy these people.

Before long, he had received personal hate mail, including demands that he be fired and death threats. The right-wing Catholic League has set up something of a witch-hunt for him, and both sides have started letter-writing campaigns to the president of the University of Minnestosa, demanding for him to be (or not to be) fired.

I personally think the situation is summed up in this comment:

That said, I hope this thing blows over soon — the kid who kicked this whole thing off was a douchebag for stealing the cracker, the (very few) Catholics who issued death threats were exponentially bigger douchebags, and this whole thing seems to be on the edge of exploding into a supernova of gratuitous asshattery.
(Yes, it’s just a cracker, but it’s a cracker that some people find very important, and the cracker-worshipers were doing their thing in a church service where the cracker-stealer didn’t have to be, so there was no point in taking the damn thing except to piss a bunch of people off)

To my mind, it seems that Prof. Myers made the comment as a geniune joke. I sent a personal letter, via air mail, to the President of the University of Minnestosa today, in support of Prof. Myers. I spent 56p and missed some of Golden Blockbusters to Fifteen to Twelve to Three to No Deal, or whatever is occupying the Channel 4 daytime slot this week.

Anyway, in other news, iPhone chaos! iPhone 3G customers have been infuriated to find out that their local AT&T/O2/Rogers/Telecel/PhoneyCompany store has not stocked enough iPhones, despite the fact they pre-ordered them. First-generation iPhone users trying to upgrade to iPhone OS X 2.0 have had problems too: Apple’s servers have buckled under the load, and iTunes has gone down.

This has the side effect of stopping the iPhone from reactivating itself once the firmware has been updated, therefore bricking the iPhone (albeit temporarily). My advice is just wait, before going out to buy an iPhone, or updating the firmware.

And, in yet more news, Fake Steve Jobs may or may not be dead. I sadly suspect the former. It seems Dan Lyons was getting tired with the character – but not to worry. A book of the best of the blog is being published.

Or maybe, Real Steve Jobs may decide to take up the baton. But, of course, he’d blog using iWeb, and the brand-spankingly-new-launched MobileMe.

In politics, David Davis has won the Haltemprice and Howden by-election, which he induced. Labour and the Lib Dems, and even the BNP, didn’t even put in a candidate – presumably as damage limitation. However, turnout was only ~30%, and this may come back to bite Davis in the future.

And in yet more news, Mock the Week is back on British TV, as is Would I Lie To You? The latter of which starts in five minutes or so – so, with that in mind, good night, don’t fall out of bed and accidentally hemmorage the floor and/or yourself, and have a fantastic weekend.

Tags: , , , ,

The racist, far-right bigots at the Daily Mail are again talking out of their backsides, claiming that we’ll need to build two million new homes just to cope with immigrants.

To be honest, that’s bollocks. Starting with the obvious, it’s ’2 million’ or ‘two million’, not ’2million’.

However, I shan’t deliberate too long on spelling errors, as the error in the Mail’s thinking becomes quickly apparent. It claims we will need to build two million homes. However, in the same article, they say:

The Government predicts that migration into England will grow from 130,000 a year now to 171,500 in 2026, the Daily Express reported.

171,000 is significantly smaller than two million. For 2 million new homes to be required, immigration rates would have to jump significantly to 171,000 per year and then sustain themselves for eleven and a half years. And this assumes that everyone will be living alone. Which they won’t.

Even more worrying, the report they cite is from Migrationwatch UK, a group that is fundamentally biased against immigration. Also, the report concludes, according to the Mail:

“The overall economic benefit of migration is small and heavily outweighed by the implications of adding 18million to our population in the next 50 years.”

There is a fundamental flaw in this figure, in that it does not take into account death and outmigration. It’s quite obvious, to me at least, that death rates will almost completely cancel out any rise in population in real terms; any rise then will be in line with the growing world population. There may be a slight increase, but the claim that millions of immigrants are ‘flooding’ into the country is nonsense.

Indeed, it’s more like a trickle. Each year, merely one nine hunded and twenty third of the country’s population is added to by immigration at the present rate. As rates of immigration rise, we can also expect birth rates to rise in the UK.

And, perhaps most fundamentally of all, the Mail seems to have forgotten that everyone in the UK is an immigrant. Well, if you go back far enough.

Tags: , ,

« Older entries